What is the goal of cross-examination?

The goal of cross-examination is fundamentally about challenging and clarifying the testimony provided by a witness. This process allows the opposing party to scrutinize the solidity of the initial statements and identify any inconsistencies, untruths, or biases in what has been said. Through effective cross-examination, an attorney aims to weaken the credibility of the witness, thereby casting doubt on their reliability and the information they provided.

Cross-examination serves to empower the legal process by ensuring that testimony is thoroughly vetted, allowing the fact-finders—such as juries or judges—to assess the reliability of evidence presented. By exposing potential weaknesses or highlighting contradictions in testimony, the cross-examiner can significantly influence the outcome of a trial.

The other possibilities, while they represent objectives relevant to other legal processes or questioning techniques, do not encapsulate the primary target of cross-examination as effectively. Providing additional facts, supporting initial testimony, or evaluating the overall credibility of evidence do not specifically address the critical function of cross-examination, which is to actively challenge and undermine the quality of prior statements made under direct examination.