What aspect is NOT involved in the definition of False Imprisonment?

In the context of False Imprisonment, the correct option indicates an aspect that is not part of its definition. False imprisonment occurs when a person is confined against their will without legal justification. This includes several critical elements.

Detention against the will of the person is integral to the definition, as the essence of false imprisonment lies in the lack of consent to the confinement. Likewise, the use of physical force or threats is often a part of how such confinement is facilitated, making this another vital component. The notion of accomplishment with or without legal process is also central, as it emphasizes that unlawful confinement can occur regardless of whether any legal procedures were followed.

However, consent from the detained individual is not involved in the definition of false imprisonment. If an individual consents to their confinement, it cannot be classified as false imprisonment, since the fundamental aspect of being 'imprisoned' involves the absence of permission to detain them. Thus, the absence of consent is what distinguishes lawful detainment from false imprisonment.