How does the judge's role differ from that of litigators during a trial?

The role of the judge as an impartial overseer of the legal process is crucial during a trial. Judges are responsible for ensuring that the trial proceeds fairly and according to established legal principles. They manage courtroom proceedings, ensure that the rules of evidence are followed, and make decisions on procedural matters. This neutrality is essential in maintaining the integrity of the judicial system, as it allows for a fair trial where both parties can present their cases and where the focus remains on the application of the law rather than personal biases or beliefs.

In contrast, litigators, who represent the parties in the case, advocate for their clients' interests, present evidence, and make arguments to persuade the judge and potentially the jury. Unlike judges, litigators have a vested interest in the outcome of the trial and work to achieve the best result for their client, which can sometimes lead to conflicts of interest or biases in their presentations.

Understanding the distinct roles of judges and litigators highlights the balance within the judicial system, where judges facilitate the process and ensure fairness, while litigators actively engage in advocating for their respective parties.